“The money was all appropriated for the top in hopes that it would trickle down to the needy. Mr. Hoover was an engineer. He knew that water trickled down. Put it uphill and let it go and it… Read More
In a sane world, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz would also be on the political ropes, in his case, for cheering the late Jesse Helms of North Carolina, an unreconstructed bigot who devoted his life to the defense of white supremacy and the advancement of far-right politics. Instead, Cruz—who in many ways is the ideological successor to Helms—will lose nothing, and continue to act as the avatar for forces that will destroy the Republican Party if they aren’t stopped.
First, the details. Yesterday, Cruz delivered a foreign policy address at the conservative Heritage Foundation for the Jesse Helms Lecture Series. (That this even exists is fitting for an organization that—until this year—employed a scientific racist to write a report on why Congress should reject comprehensive immigration reform, and in particular, an easier to path to residency and citizenship for low-income Latino workers.)
Cruz’s speech began with a little trivia about his political history: His first campaign donation—at ten years old—was to Helms. He continued with a declaration: “We need 100 more Jesse Helms in the U.S. Senate.”
The Heritage Foundation I must admit that I know little to nothing about it other than it is an extreme right political organization. But I do know some about Jesse Helms and those like him. Yes, Jesse might have been the first great obstructionist but that is not how he went down in history. As the quote above said he was one of the final unreconstructed bigots who undoubtably was a member of the KKK and most other racists organizations. He bullied anyone who crossed him with vitriol racists comments.
Even in the 1970s when I was beginning to become politically savvy Helms and Strom Thurmond were the faces of the segregationist South. They boldly proclaimed that the Civil Rights Act had to be repealed in order for us to maintain States rights which was a buzz word in those days) and for the country to return to its roots. Mr. Thurmond later repented of his views during those years but Mr. Helms went to his death with nothing but hatred for many minority citizens of this country.
It totally amazes me that anyone would bring him up as some sort of hero today but that is absolutely what the Heritage Foundation and Senator Ted Cruz are doing. When I originally read this report all I could do was shake my head in total disbelief. They say that racism has not disappeared from our society; it has simply moved below the surface. I pray that is not so but can imagine it to be. And sometimes as in this case not very much below the surface.
Is this the brand of Republicanism that so many of my conservative friends espouse? Are they really willing to put Jesse Helms as the face of their standards, principles, and beliefs?
Politics…… It seems that the common good, that is things that people who have different political views can come together and accomplish, is becoming a rarity in the U.S. the last decade or so. There are a lot of things out there that could be accomplished if only some would learn the art of compromise. Everything doesn’t have to have a political point or exactly mesh with your “principles”.
Religion…. The version of religion that we cling to causes much segregation in today’s world. For the most part Lutherans, Baptists and most other religious groups will not come together with others outside that group for a common purpose. The most striking personal example of that is when I was trying to put together a cross denominational benefit dinner for the homeless shelter/ soup kitchen where I have volunteered for several years. I contacted ten other area churches with a heartfelt appeal to attend a benefit dinner at my church. I spent hours on composing the message to make sure it would not raise conflict on the different beliefs of each group. Out of the ten churches not a single person crossed the line to attend the dinner.
Even my local church group had only a meager representation. I really don’t know if my message even made it past the filter of the leader of the church to the congregants or not. I guess I naively thought that helping the poor just seemed like something all Christians could get behind. That was my first and last time for me to try anything in a cross denominational area. Jesus made it clear that we are to be our brother’s keeper, that we are to take care of the “least of these”. This appeal seemed like a natural to me but I sadly found that too many barriers are in place in the church to see this common good issue. The fact that many churches, including the one I attended, actually forbid ministers to join in with other denominations in a common prayer should have pre-warned me of my upcoming failure.
Religion and Politics are two issues that everyone tells us should not be mixed but it seems they are inextricably mixed anyway among so many of us. Sometimes for the good but it seems often to the detriment of both. Too many of my conservative Christian friends allow their politics to shape their views of religion and not the other way around. Instead of seeing the Good Samaritan as an example to follow they see him as a naive person who doesn’t understand “the poor will always be with us” so why even bother. Too many let a single issue (abortion, gay marriage, other below the belt issues) get in the way of coming together for the greater good.
How sad is that?????
In the case of UPS, the 15,000 spouses are husbands or wives whose employers also offer health benefits. This appears to be a case where they like the plan they have (they’ve opted for the UPS plan rather than their employer plan) and can’t keep it…..
And for the 15,000 who are affected, it’s a bit simplistic to say their options are narrowing solely because of Obamacare.
UPS didn’t say the law was the only factor behind its decision. And some health-care experts argue that businesses are using Obama’s Affordable Care Act (ACA) as a convenient excuse for continuing a long-term trend: straining to control the relentless rise in the cost of health benefits.
I’m sure all those wackos in congress, especially the top nut Senator Lee is screaming that this is yet another reason to un-fund Obamacare but to me this decision just makes sense. If we insist that our private businesses have to fund healthcare instead of like most other countries in having government take on that chore then the employers should be able to play on an even field. I’m sure UPS, like their pay scale, gives their employees a pretty strong healthcare plan. Probably much better than many. But if a person is covered by their own employer why should they be able to insist that they spouse’s employer bear the burden of their healthcare?
As the last paragraph in the quote says there are many who are using ACA as an excuse for something they would have done anyway. The relentless rise in the cost of health benefits will never be contained as long as we have such a hodgepodge of ways of addressing this issue. Single payer system such as we currently have with Medicare and Medicaid is the only solution to this mammoth problem. Until we learn that lesson from the rest of the world, and even from our own systems, we will continue to burden our employers with an expense that their foreign competitors don’t have.
Come on UPS, don’t hide behind Obamacare as the reason you did something you should have done years ago. Call it like it is and that is a management decision. For the most part I admire UPS for how they run their business. It amazes me how they can move packages to my door in such a short amount of time. I also admire that they pay their employees very well. Blaming Obamacare for a good business decision just tarnishes that image.
While we are meddling in the various civil wars in the Middle East, and aren’t almost all of them in one form of war or another, how do we choose which side we are one? It seems in Syria and Egypt the “rebels” are the extremists who are burning churches that are not muslim whenever they come across them. How do we choose where to inject a few billion dollars to affect the outcome.
Mr. Obama is trying to make the case to drop bombs and cruise missiles on Syria to “punish” Assad for apparently using chemical weapons. But in the process he also wants to help the rebels get an advantage. But as I, and many others see it, by doing that he is actually choosing one extremist over another. What good does that do.
All of this choosing sides between bad or worse reminds me of my younger days when Mr. Reagan decided to help El Salvador and take down Nicaragua or maybe it was the other way around? I know we spent millions both above and below the table on those wars. Ollie North who broke so many laws doing it was still considered a hero by many of my conservative friends. Of course today both countries are considered our friends, that is if we really have any friends in that part of the world.
Wouldn’t it be interesting to see what would happen if we didn’t intervene in the affairs of another country and just let things happen. I know to all those who are so fearful of everything in the world that seems an impossibility.
But I’m just a simple guy so what do I know….
We seem to be a nation that so desperately needs someone that knows something. The problem is that we are looking in the absolutely wrong places.
- We look for someone who agrees with us in our entrenched “principles” instead of someone who will show us a better way.
- We look for someone who can drown us in their insightful rhetoric instead of someone who has actually been there and done that.
- We look for someone who can defeat our enemies instead of someone who can teach us to love each other.
- We look for someone who sees God as we do instead of someone who can show us what God really expects from us.
- We look for someone who will get us out of all our troubles instead of someone who will point out why we have those troubles.
We will never see that someone unless we open our minds to other than our current beliefs and world views. We are the problem we are trying to solve and until we come to realize that we will be forever mired into our current condition….
But I’m just a simple guy so what do I know???
“Too many people spend money they earned..to buy things they don’t want..to impress people that they don’t like.” ― Will Rogers
“If you are going to write, talk, comment, or argue over any public question, don’t do it by just reading one newspaper….You can tell in a minute a person that only reads one paper.” – Will Rogers, 18 March 1934
Some more words of wisdom for today spoken by WIll Rogers almost eighty years ago. I can say for a fact that many of my conservative friends and past classmates have Fox News running in their homes throughout the day. I am also sure that is the only source of news many of them expose themselves to. Well not quite, some probably get a regular dose of Mr. Limbaugh and his bigoted rhetoric. I just can’t understand how some can, or even want, to stay in that mode? Loving, instead of hating or maybe just fearing your neighbor, is a much more satisfying life. Yes Will, even today you can tell in a minute a person that watches Fox News as their only source of information.
A quote I often cite is “You don’t have to know what you are saying as long as you say it with authority”. That seems to mimic what Will is saying above but I think these times today that has far exceeded what it was in his days. One example of that might be President Obama. His rhetoric captivated many during the 2008 campaign season (including me ) but lack of experience just did not allow him to begin to actually accomplish what he said. Of course a totally anti-everything Republican congress didn’t help either.
Another group of people who never seem to know really what they are saying are all the financial advisers out there. The fact that if the average person just put their money into a simple low cost stock index fund they would beat the vast majority of those guys. Now I am not including those advisers who work for the 1% in this list. Their job is to do everything to insure that the super-rich keep from paying their fair share of taxes or actually any taxes at all. They seem to be doing a pretty good job of that . But then again that is probably due to the yahoos in congress who allow all those loopholes to exist in our tax codes that they constantly swim through.
I guess you could say that I am also included in the group who know little about what they are talking about as I am not an “expert” on any of the matters I discuss on this blog. I am just a simple guy with at least some degree of a way with words. But I do seem to have an opinion on most anything. I don’t often really know what I am saying but I try to say it with authority. :) :)
Happy Friday the 13th (if any of you actually celebrate that type of thing)…..
Al-Qaeda-linked rebels take Syrian Christian village, activists sayIt is unclear how an historic village just 26 miles from Damascus could be overrun; locals say rebels burned churches
It bothers me greatly that there will likely be severe innocent deaths associated with President Obama’s rush to enter into the Syrian civil war. Yeah, million dollar smart bombs and drones are more accurate than huge shells being blasted from the battleship Wisconsin as in the past but they still kill many who are just trying to survive the conflicts around them.
If I am to believe Senator McCain when he says he heard it from Mr. Obama’s lips that he also want to bomb several sites to give an advantage to the rebels in this conflict. A good percentage of these rebels belong to the same group that we are fighting against in two other Middle East countries. And almost all of them are probably involved in burning Christian churches, people or no people inside, when they take over the small towns in the region.
Do I really want the money I send to the government monthly to go to this cause? No way, no how!! Please Mr. Obama, with the exclusion of your lone supporter France, listen to the rest of the world when they tell you to seek peace, not another war. If you really want to hurt Assad then do it electronically by taking away some of his money. Isolate him financially instead of killing innocents with the bombs my tax dollars pay for.
Recent studies show, for example, that wealthier people are more likely to cut people off in traffic and to behave unethically in simulated business and charity scenarios. Earlier this year, statistics on charitable giving revealed that while the wealthy donate about 1.3% of their income to charity, the poorest actually give more than twice as much as a proportion of their earnings — 3.2%.
“There’s this idea that the more you have, the less entitled and more grateful you feel; and the less you have, the more you feel you deserve. That’s not what we find,” says author Paul Piff, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley. “This seems to be the opposite of noblesse oblige.”
(MORE: Why the Rich Are Less Ethical: They See Greed as Good) In five different experiments involving several hundred undergraduates and 100 adults recruited from online communities, the researchers found higher levels of both narcissism and entitlement among those of higher income and social class.
I have had some pretty harrowing experiences with narcissists in my life. I just can’t image someone being so self-focused especially those who call themselves religious. Almost all of religions spiritual documents take a very firm stand against that trait. My definition of a narcissist is someone who has their head stuck so far up their rear-end that they can see nothing but themselves. I simply have no patience or compassion for a narcissist. I know I am told to love them but, with only a few exceptions, I find it almost impossible to manage that feat.
One of the things that often comes with any degree of success in the financial world is ego and that seems be often be a major trait of most narcissists. Those who manage to make a few bucks soon convince themselves that they are the greatest person in the world and that no one knows more about real life than they do. Now before you start piling on I will freely admit that not all, or probably even most, successful money gatherers are narcissists or have infinite egos and thank heavens for that. But I am convinced that they have their inordinate share and the source above seems to re-enforce that belief.
As the study says the wealthier you are the more likely you are to treat others poorly or to donate any significant percentage of your income to charitable causes. I know Mr. Romney ranted about how the 47% of us feel entitled to take money from the real wealth makers but according to this study he simply got it bass-ackwards and the electorate let him know that…..
Will President Obama listen to some of the leaders of the other 95% of the world’s population and not rush into another war, no matter how limited he claims it to be? Going it alone has cost this country too much in terms of our debt and what we have left spend on the “least of these”, let alone the lives of our young people. I know all the generals who are constantly whispering into his ears and got him convinced that the world is an evil place that we need to bomb to make it right.
When I voted for Mr. Obama in 2008 one of my dreams was that he would become one of my heroes in life. Maybe even pushing Woodrow Wilson out of that top political space. But of course that hope has long diminished. He just seems to be yet another president who mollycoddles our military/industrial complex in its rush to war. Wilson went to his death trying to make the first version of the United Nations into a true world governing body. I wonder what the world would be like today if he had succeeded instead of dying an untimely death? I know my Republican friends for the most part hate the U.N. They see it as limiting the U.S. dominance of the world. They see it as giving others a say in world matter that they want for the U.S. alone. Of course that is just one area where I fundamentally disagree with them.
It is very likely that if, or maybe given history I should say when, we bomb Syria that the collateral damage will be several times worse than the original death count due to chemical weapons. I just hope that it doesn’t end up like Iraq where it was several orders of magnitude higher. Like MLK’s speech of fifty years ago, I have a dream that someday all human life will be valued on the same level of importance. I dream that my country will encourage and support a strong and benevolent United Nations presence and then move into the background with moral support instead of bombs and drones. But, given the power of this countries war machine I doubt that my dream will ever come to pass.
No, I’m not mimicking Sargent Schultz from Hogan’s Heroes with the title. Instead it is to proclaim that I know nothing about the latest round of young stars especially the singers, if you want to call them that. I guess you can call me one of those out-of-touch old people if you want. I vaguely know some names like Madonna, Lady Gaga, Ice Cube and maybe a few others but I have no idea what they do that made them famous.
I know more or less than nothing about the music scene of the last 20+ years. I know about that time that songs were rapped, whatever that means? I am guessing it is kind of like when Sabastian Cabot read some of Bob Dylan’s lyrics as if they were poetry. I still have that album by the way. I wish I could pull it out and listen to it once in a while. It was kind of neat.
In this 1960s when I had relatively good hearing in at least one ear I was a folk song type guy. I played the guitar and memorized many songs from Dylan, Joan Beaz, Simon and Garfunkel, Peter, Paul & Mary, Donavon, McClean and several other. I liked some of the Beatles, Stones, and a few other rockers but folk music was my thing. When I lost all my hearing in the 1980s all that went away. I still remember many of the lyrics but the tunes have totally vanished from memory now.
I guess I am truly an old person in this regard. Most kids today wouldn’t have a clue about any of the names above. It sometimes startles me when I tell some of the young volunteers at the soup kitchen I that was on the team that invented the Trimline telephone and they have no idea what that is! I have to try to describe it to them and at least some say yeah they think maybe grandma had one of those.
I know nothing about much of what goes on in the world today and some of the things I do know I wish I didn’t. I wish I had never heard of Iraq, Iran, Syria and for that matter almost every country in the Middle East. I wish I didn’t know so many of the games the politicians play today. My world would be a much more pleasant place I guess if I knew more about Lady Gaga than I do about that dysfunctional group of yahoos in Washington or even in my local Statehouse for that matter I would probably have a more soothing life.
Maybe I need to tune in on all the teen scene so that it might drown out some of the stuff I do know…..
“Mixing religion and politics is like mixing ice cream and manure. It doesn’t do much to the manure but it sure does ruin the ice cream”, my friend Tony Campolo likes to say. No one would vote for… Read More
The current Democratic Party is too skeptical of business, too hostile toward wealth creation, and overly abusive of America’s most productive citizens—often because there are votes to be had by poking the rich in the eye. Yes, a modern economy needs regulation, but that regulation needs to be targeted and have minimal costs. Like a good physician, we want to fix the problem—because there are problems that need government fixes—without messing anything else up.
— The Centrist Manifesto (Wheelan, Charles)
Some folks, especially my more conservative friends (yeah, I got a few), don’t think I criticize the Democratic party enough so I thought I would bring up a quote about them here and say a few words about it. Now, I realize that this won’t be enough for them but it is the best I can do right now.
As shown above these words are from the Centrist Manifesto which is the new party that I hope will someday bring some sanity back into our political processes. If I were to put a flag on myself, and I really don’t like doing that, I would now call myself a Centrist. I hope they become a very viable third-party or maybe even replace on of the two around today.
I spent thirty years in the corporate world in various middle management positions. The company I worked for was for years the largest in the United States. That is until those yahoos in government split them up into a dozen pieces. For the first fifteen years I felt a strong loyalty to them. I would never have purchased a competitor’s product. The last fifteen year due to cultural changes brought on by the MBAs some of that loyalty became tarnished. But I never lost respect for my employer and appreciated the compensation I was awarded. I have been on a pension from them now for thirteen plus years. The pension along with Social Security allows me to live a pretty comfortable life.
So I agree with the statement above. The Democratic party is just too hostile toward America’s employers and even more hostile toward those who create wealth. I certainly admire those who started out with little means becoming wealthy due to offering a better product or service. Thank heavens for them or the American condition might be quite different. I wish my Democratic friends would get over their apparent contempt for people who are successful in their lives.
I believe that regulation is totally necessary to reign in capitalist abuses as were evidenced even in my lifetime. But, the Democrats just get too corrupted by their power in government and go overboard. Yes, we need government to provide for the general welfare of our citizens as stated in our constitution but many times the Democrats need to reign in their reigning in… if you know what I mean.
There is nothing wrong with becoming rich because of our contributions and the Democratic party needs to understand that fact. Inherited wealth, well that is a different matter for me….
More criticisms coming soon. :)
But has Obama damaged the power of the president by allowing Congress its say? Is his decision, in fact, a “historic American retreat” – at least within the context of domestic politics?
Certainly, he’s doing something that no recent US president has done. Ronald Reagan invaded Grenada in 1983 and bombed Libya in 1986 without congressional approval, and Bill Clinton committed US forces to NATO air campaigns in Bosnia in 1995 and Kosovo in 1999 and launched a missile attack against terrorists in Afghanistan in 1998 without congressional backing. When Obama signed on to the 2011 Libya operation without involving Congress, he appeared to be endorsing an increasingly clear doctrine of presidential power: Congress was needed only if the military engagements would be long and involve significant ground troops – as in the two Iraq wars.
Mr. Obama was prior to politics a constitutional professor so he probably knows more about the constitution than most of his predecessors. He knows that the constitution says that congress is the one to declare war. Yeah, I know that every president since at least Reagan has pretty much ignored that policy by saying they are not declaring war but instead just getting involved in a little dispute. In fact the only declared war in my lifetime is World War II (I think).
I am probably in a very distinct minority on this (wouldn’t be the first time :) ) but I salute President Obama for doing what he did in getting congress involved in the decision to put Americans lives and assets into another regional conflict on the other side of the world. While we are cutting aid to the poor we shouldn’t be going into further debt to buy a bunch of million dollar bombs and drones. Why are our priorities so out of whack? We should make going to war, whether it is officially declared or not, a very difficult thing to accomplish. It should only be used for the more dire of circumstances. And we should never “go it alone” without consensus of other countries and especially without consensus even within our own citizenry. Who made us the supreme moralists of the world?
Yes, what Mr. Obama did might have weakened the office of president but I consider that a good thing if it keeps us out of a few more “conflicts”.
But I’m just a simple guy so what do I know….