Divided We Fall Project – Part 2

About a month ago I put out a post about trying to discern why we are so divided. I mentioned that I was reading two books on the topic, one from a conservative writer and one from a progressive. In this post is the second installment in that series. I recently completed both books as shown here and what I found about the source of this divide was not unexpected. But, what was is the magnitude of the problem.

Ezra Klein, who is a progressive, talked quite a bit about the statistics whereas David French, who was the conservative, spent much of the book talking about the magnitude of the feelings among the MAGA clan. I won’t bore you with all the details of the books. Instead, I will come out and give you the final thoughts of the authors via a couple of quotes from each.


Let’s start with the Progressive view:

We are so locked into our political identities that there is virtually no candidate, no information, no condition, that can force us to change our minds. We will justify almost anything or anyone so long as it helps our side, and the result is a politics devoid of guardrails, standards, persuasion, or accountability.

Klein, Ezra. Why We’re Polarized

Politics devoid of guardrails, standards, persuasion, or even accountability is primarily where I see we are today. The GOP was once known as the party of fiscal responsibility. That has been completely discarded in the last dozen or more years. The only thing they stand for now is a party of trying to hold on to White Privilege. Budgets mean nothing to them, even the candidates are meaningless. It’s all about the war of survival.

Republicans are overwhelmingly dependent on white voters. Democrats are a coalition of liberal whites, African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians. Republicans are overwhelmingly dependent on Christians…. But those are two very different party structures. Sorting has made the Democrats into a coalition of difference and driven Republicans further into sameness. As a result, appealing to Democrats requires appealing to a lot of different kinds of people with different interests. It means winning liberal whites in New Hampshire and traditionalist blacks in South Carolina. It means talking to Irish Catholics in Boston and the karmically curious in California. Democrats need to go broad to win over their party and, as we’ll see, they need to reach into right-leaning territory to win power. Republicans can afford to go deep.

Klein, Ezra. Why We’re Polarized (p. 230). Avid Reader Press / Simon & Schuster. Kindle Edition.

I think by these quotes it is obvious that Democrats have the more difficult challenge short term. It kinda reminds me of the idea of “herding cats”. Everyone knows that is an almost impossible task. I doubt there is very much common experiences between the New Hampshire liberal and the SC African American. How do you keep that coalition together?


Now on to the Conservative view of our division:

We increasingly loathe our political opponents. The United States is in the grip of a phenomenon called “negative polarization.” In plain English this means that a person belongs to their political party not so much because they like their own party but because they hate and fear the other side. Republicans don’t embrace Republican policies so much as they despise Democrats and Democratic policies. Democrats don’t embrace Democratic policies as much as they vote to defend themselves from Republicans. At this point, huge majorities actively dislike their political opponents and significant minorities see them as possessing subhuman characteristics. Moreover, each of these realities is set to get worse. Absent unforeseen developments, the present trends are self-reinforcing.

French, David A. Divided We Fall (p. 2). St. Martin’s Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.

Of course, evidence of this war is Mitch McConnell. He has totally abandoned anything resembling party principles or ethics. His main goal during the last 4 years has been to appoint as many lifetime federal judges. Virtually nothing else is even a remote second to him.

Neither author seems to have much hope for the future. They just don’t see a way for this polarization to end. That is depressing indeed! Neither of these books were easy to read. I am an optimist at heart and have to believe that there is a way out of this abyss. But, it might take a generation or two to make that happen. If we have that long?

More on that in a future Monday Post.

4 comments

  1. My adult 40+ daughter said to me yesterday that she believes it will be fifty years at least before we have any perspective on what’s happened these last four years, echoing your “generation or two” comment. Thanks for the hard work of reading and summarizing this for us.

    Like

    1. Thanks for the thoughts Linda. History will decide. The problem with that is that “history is written by the victors”. 🧐 Let’s hope that “Trumpians” are not in charge then.

      But I do believe that all this ugliness will be pretty much eliminated when the Millennials, and Gen Z take over from us Boomers.

      Like

  2. From my perspective both authors are correct. This will be a tough long slog. If we do not stand up for our union we will lose it.

    Like

    1. So true, Fred. I began my awareness of things political with the McCarthy years, and they were ugly indeed. These time remind me of those times, and they are now just a footnote in history. I doubt if 10% of us under 40 even know what I am talking about. Let’s hope the same thing can be said for these times 50 years from now.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s