David Brooks from the New York Times and the PBS Newshour recently used a word I haven’t heard in a long time. That word is the title of this post and here is the definition. This word just seems soooo appropriate for someone we all know. I don’t even have to mention his name.
If there is any single word that can possibly contain who this guy is, bluster is it. He is certainly loud, totally aggressive, as indignant as anyone I could ever imagine. He refuses to believe in facts other than the ones he made up.
But I think the last part of this definition will certainly apply now that we have a Democratic House of Representatives. They will do their best to assure that aggressive indignant bluster has little effect. All we have to do now is to sit back and wait for January 20, 2021, and he can take his bluster wherever he wants, as long as it is out of my sight.
Good riddance to horrid bluster.
Thanks David for resurrecting this word for me…